Design Solution Evaluation Criteria for Smart Pot
We have made a list to consider while preparing the final products to check as the Evaluation Criteria for the Smart Pot design that you are working for, our dear designer team. 1. Shape & Size Refinement Real-Life Usability: Is the flowerpot shape practical for everyday use, including placement on windowsills and tabletops? Size Variations: Does the design offer compact and medium-sized options to cater to different spaces? Light Module Solution: Does the pot include a solution for light attachment, for example: telescopic or foldable light module to adapt to compact spaces? Compactness of the light: Is the light module designed to remain unobtrusive when not in use? Ergonomics: Is the pot's shape intuitive for user interaction, particularly for elderly users? 2. Display Screen Design Compact Interface: Is the display screen compact yet effective, integrating essential features (humidity, temperature, battery level, and music controls)? Placement: Is the screen placed near the upper edge of the pot for easy visibility without compromising aesthetics? User-Friendly Graphics: Does the display use calming colors and simple graphics suitable for older users? Multiple States: Are plant conditions represented through expressive states (e.g., happy, sad, sleepy) in an engaging way? Space Efficiency: Does the face display occupy minimal space and blend seamlessly with the overall design? 3. Buttons and Controls Hybrid Approach: Does the design balance physical and touch buttons effectively? Essential Physical Buttons: Are key controls (or control ex: power, reset, etc.) accessible and tactile for elderly users? Touch Screen: Is the touch interface intuitive for infrequent yet detailed interactions? Accessibility: Are buttons and screens easy to operate, considering font size, brightness, and navigation simplicity? 5. App Integration Only one or two screenshot kind of frames are enough, we don't want details. It could be digital pictures or hand drawing, choose which is easier for you. Intuitive Wireframe: Does the app offer a simple and clear interface with the following features: Home Screen: Overall plant health indicators (water level, sunlight, temperature). Notifications: Custom reminders for watering and lighting adjustments. Sound Controls: Natural sound selection and volume adjustment. Elderly Accessibility: Does the app accommodate elderly users with larger text and simplified navigation? 6. Charging & Energy Port Standard: Does the pot use a USB Type-C charging port for universal compatibility? Safety Standards: Is the port and plug designed to meet Turkey’s electrical safety regulations? Energy Storage: Is there sufficient energy storage in the temple tips for auxiliary functions (e.g., lighting)? 9. Aesthetic Appeal Design Harmony: Does the pot maintain an organic aesthetic while incorporating functional features? Color & Material: Does the design retain earthy tones like brown, complementing the use of wood for the stand? Render Feedback: Are the renders realistic and functional, aiding in refining the color and material choices? 10. Market Feasibility Cost-Effectiveness: Can the product be produced and sold at a competitive price? Target Demographic: Does the design cater to both elderly users and modern plant enthusiasts? Unique Selling Points: Are the integrated features (e.g., telescopic light, expressive states, sound integration) market-differentiating? 8.…